feat(catalog): prevent and repair Arcturus emulator data errors

Block invalid catalog_items writes at the API level (points currency
allowlist, non-negative prices, positive amount, limited stack >= sold
count, unique sibling order numbers) and auto-assign unique order numbers
on bulk create. Add a catalog-maintenance scan + transactional repair that
fixes pre-existing rows: resets unsupported points_type, clamps negative
costs, sets amount to 1, raises limited_stack, renumbers duplicate orders
and deletes offers with missing page/item references. Surface the issue
count and a fix button in the admin maintenance panel.

Also: add enabled/retired flag to clone sources, classify poster and
currency furniture in item-kind, and remove the obsolete update-Nitrov3.sh.

src/features/catalog/domain/offer-input.test.ts

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ describe("offer compatibility", () => {
 		expect(parseFurnitureIds("12;23;12")).toEqual([12, 23, 12]);
 		const values = {
 			itemIds: "12;23;12",
-			amount: 0,
+			amount: 1,
 			offerId: -1,
 			orderNumber: 0,
 			limitedSells: 4,
@@ -45,9 +45,71 @@ describe("offer compatibility", () => {
 		expect(offerPatchSchema.safeParse({ costCredits: Infinity }).success).toBe(
 			false,
 		);
-		expect(offerPatchSchema.parse({ offerId: 0, amount: 0 })).toEqual({
+		expect(offerPatchSchema.parse({ offerId: 0, amount: 1 })).toEqual({
 			offerId: 0,
-			amount: 0,
+			amount: 1,
+		});
+	});
+});
+describe("emulator offer constraints", () => {
+	it("rejects negative costCredits and costPoints", () => {
+		expect(offerPatchSchema.safeParse({ costCredits: -1 }).success).toBe(false);
+		expect(offerPatchSchema.safeParse({ costPoints: -5 }).success).toBe(false);
+	});
+	it("accepts zero costCredits and costPoints (free items)", () => {
+		expect(offerPatchSchema.parse({ costCredits: 0, costPoints: 0 })).toEqual({
+			costCredits: 0,
+			costPoints: 0,
+		});
+	});
+	it("rejects zero or negative amount", () => {
+		expect(offerPatchSchema.safeParse({ amount: 0 }).success).toBe(false);
+		expect(offerPatchSchema.safeParse({ amount: -1 }).success).toBe(false);
+	});
+	it("accepts positive amount", () => {
+		expect(offerPatchSchema.parse({ amount: 1 })).toEqual({ amount: 1 });
+	});
+	it("rejects unsupported pointsType values", () => {
+		expect(offerPatchSchema.safeParse({ pointsType: 101 }).success).toBe(
+			false,
+		);
+		expect(offerPatchSchema.safeParse({ pointsType: 103 }).success).toBe(
+			false,
+		);
+		expect(offerPatchSchema.safeParse({ pointsType: -1 }).success).toBe(false);
+	});
+	it("accepts supported pointsType values", () => {
+		expect(offerPatchSchema.parse({ pointsType: 0 })).toEqual({
+			pointsType: 0,
+		});
+		expect(offerPatchSchema.parse({ pointsType: 5 })).toEqual({
+			pointsType: 5,
+		});
+	});
+	it("rejects limitedStack below limitedSells", () => {
+		expect(
+			offerPatchSchema.safeParse({ limitedStack: 0, limitedSells: 1 })
+				.success,
+		).toBe(false);
+		expect(
+			offerPatchSchema.safeParse({ limitedStack: 5, limitedSells: 10 })
+				.success,
+		).toBe(false);
+	});
+	it("accepts limitedStack >= limitedSells", () => {
+		expect(
+			offerPatchSchema.parse({ limitedStack: 10, limitedSells: 5 }),
+		).toEqual({ limitedStack: 10, limitedSells: 5 });
+		expect(
+			offerPatchSchema.parse({ limitedStack: 0, limitedSells: 0 }),
+		).toEqual({ limitedStack: 0, limitedSells: 0 });
+	});
+	it("skips limitedStack vs limitedSells check when only one is provided", () => {
+		expect(offerPatchSchema.parse({ limitedStack: 0 })).toEqual({
+			limitedStack: 0,
+		});
+		expect(offerPatchSchema.parse({ limitedSells: 5 })).toEqual({
+			limitedSells: 5,
 		});
 	});
 });